This is a long article, but I hope you will stick with me as I bring up many important points to bear in mind when discussing this case. All Actions Were Taken For the Safety and Security of the Adult Detention Center On Tuesday, Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Ray Morrogh announced that he will not
That Was Then Barely a week seems to go by without a public statement being issued by officials in Fairfax County that includes some now-obligatory remark about transparency. They really seem to think that if they say the word enough, the public will actually be fooled into thinking that is the same as being transparent. It’s a tactic that’s worked before, but
To remember the many victims of police violence in Fairfax County, and to continue to press for justice and accountability for these deaths, Northern Virginia Cop Block is holding a protest on Tuesday, August 4th in front of the judicial center that houses the police headquarters, the sheriff’s office, county courthouse, and jail. This date
What has the Fairfax County Police Department learned in the aftermath of John Geer’s unjustified death? If you read Iraq vet Alex Horton’s article in the Washington Post yesterday, you know the answer is “absolutely nothing.” Of course, this would have also been obvious to anyone paying attention over the past 2 years, but Horton’s
This is a long article, but I hope you will stick with me as I bring up many important points to bear in mind when discussing this case.
All Actions Were Taken For the Safety and Security of the Adult Detention Center
On Tuesday, Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Ray Morrogh announced that he will not be seeking charges against any of the six sheriff’s deputies involved in the death of Natasha McKenna. During a press conference Morrogh showed infinite sympathy to the deputies, “who are faced with a difficult job that most people don’t want to do.” He also bizarrely claimed that he “was not going to second guess people who are struggling with that situation,” even though his entire job as a prosecutor is to second guess people to determine potential guilt, particularly in incidents where a life has been lost. In the report he released that same day, Morrogh repeatedly rejects the idea that McKenna died due to the 4 Taser shocks she received, even going so far as to say that there’s never been a death directly caused by a Taser.
This is a setback for justice and police accountability in Fairfax County, but not really a surprise; The Adam Torres indictment Morrogh pursued last month is an anomaly in a career more commonly characterized by an unbefitting deference to law enforcement and an unwillingness to engage regarding deaths caused by its officers. The full faith and credit that some community members now eagerly credit him with are premature, especially amongst those concerned with overall police misconduct in Fairfax, and not merely the outcome of one individual case. Judgment about any supposed change of heart Morrogh has had should be reserved until after the Torres trial concludes and we see whether he puts on a vigorous prosecution to secure the guilty verdict the case deserves.
Surprisingly, the commonwealth’s attorney’s report and incident reports were released without redactions, revealing the names of the six sheriff’s deputies involved for the first time:
- Lucas Salzman (who used the Taser)
- Paul Miller
- Deputy Adam Henry
- Deputy Jonathan Perryman
- Deputy Patrick McPartlin
- Deputy Kenneth Krstulovic
Nearly all of the incident reports released by the sheriff’s office end with this telling line, “All actions taken were for the safety and security of the adult detention center.”
All of the following is based on Morrogh’s report. When reading this very sympathetic to law-enforcement report, remember that we only know about this case because someone within the Fairfax County Sheriff’s Department was disturbed enough about what happened to leak the incident report to the media.
At age 37, Natasha McKenna had a long history of mental illness, with her first psychiatric hospitalization occurring at age 14. She has been diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Despite apparently being competent enough to maintain her own apartment and car, McKenna has a series of instances of disturbing behavior and paranoid delusions at area hospitals and businesses between January 7th and January 15th. She has several encounters with police where she is subdued and taken into custody. She is also combative and physically aggressive when admitted to hospitals for psychiatric holds during this time.
On January 15th, Alexandria police respond to a disturbance at a local car rental agency, where they encounter McKenna and attempt to take her into custody again. A fight ensues after two police officers grab both of McKenna’s arms, and eventually 8 officers are involved in subduing her at various times. They use handcuffs, pepper spray, a hobble, a spit sock, and responding medics administer a sedative. She is charged with assaulting an officer for punching one of the officers during this incident.
She is eventually transported to INOVA Alexandria Hospital, where she continues to struggle and requires multiple officers to restrain her. She is transferred to the psychiatric ward at Mount Vernon Hospital where she remains under an emergency custody order until she is discharged on January 25th. During this stay medical professionals find many of the same health conditions uncovered during her earlier hospitalizations, rhabdomyolysis, leukocytosis, acute renal failure, and lactic acidosis.
She’s discharged at 12:30 PM on January 25th, and is brought to INOVA Fairfax Hospital by ambulance less than 8 hours later reporting a sexual assault. The Fairfax County police officers who investigate her report review video footage from the area where McKenna said the attack occur and don’t see any evidence of a assault. McKenna is discharged from the hospital and arrested for a warrant stemming from the January 15 assault charge on the Alexandria police officer. McKenna is taken to the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center (ADC), where she remains until the fatal incident on February 3, 2015.
The Fatal Incident and Natasha McKenna’s Feats of Legendary Superhuman Strength
“The propagandist’s purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human.” — Aldous Huxley
The video of the incident is embedded below, if you can stomach scenes of extended senseless torture and abuse inflicted upon a terrified and helpless woman. If you do watch it, bear in mind the report’s extensive references to this petite woman’s “superhuman” and even demon-like strength, which law enforcement officers claim was sufficient to literally lift the multiple men lying on top of her off the ground. Also bear in mind that these statements seem to come from interviews after McKenna’s death, rather than from incident reports submitted the day of the encounters, which could have impacted the information provided. At any rate, see if you see any evidence of that superhuman strength in the video. I didn’t.
Not only does this characterization echo statements made by Darren Wilson regarding Mike Brown, it also serves to dehumanize and mythologize persons suffering from mental illness. It’s perfectly plausible that someone who suffers from disordered moods or thinking must somehow possess superhuman physical might that overpowers mere mortals such as ourselves, right?
Pete Earley, a noted journalist and advocate for the mentally ill, has an insightful article about this latest development in the case and the many lost opportunities for diversion from jail and to appropriate treatment that Natasha McKenna experienced in the last month of her life. He writes:
“On the day McKenna was repeatedly shocked with a 50,000 taser, she had agreed to not resist when she was first told that she was being transferred. In fact, she voluntarily agreed to be handcuffed. It was only after she saw a Sheriff’s Emergency Response Team waiting outside her cell that she panicked. The reason was obvious. Three days earlier, McKenna had clung to a mattress that deputies were attempting to drag out of her cell because she was using it to block a widow. She had clung onto it and actually been pulled from her cell into the hallway. At that point, she was struck several times on the head to force her back into her cell. Because of that incident, SERT was readied.
Morrogh’s report explains that the SERT team held a briefing before approaching the cell. His point was to show that the team’s approach was not haphazard. It was by the book. But it also could be argued that it shows the deputies had decided to use force to get her out of that cell regardless of how she reacted.”
In his report Morrogh states (emphasis mine): “In some cases, the presence of the SERT team dressed in all black or Tyvek can scare an individual. So, in an effort to keep Ms. McKenna calm, Lt. Miller approached the cell by himself at first…Lt. Miller stood at Ms. McKenna’s cell door (FR-2) and explained that deputies were there to move her out of her cell and take her to Alexandria… At that moment Ms. McKenna appeared to Lt. Miller to be rational. He asked her if she would cooperate and she said, “Fine.” It was Lt. Miller’s goal to obtain Ms. McKenna’s voluntary compliance with the process and avoid the use of force. Based upon her response, he believed she would be compliant. He asked her to put her arms out of the food slot so that he could hand cuff her. She said “okay” and complied. Lt. Miller handcuffed her and applied the rip hobble to the handcuffs so that Ms. McKenna could not withdraw her hands.”
An aside, but if you’ve watched the video, you know that Ms. McKenna was naked during this incident. One wonders why Lt. Miller didn’t bother asking her if she would like to put clothing on before they took her out into the hallway in front of the numerous jail staff present. They were transporting her to Alexandria in the middle of winter, apparently with the intention to only loosely drape a smock over her as covering.
This is completely glossed over in the report, but McKenna was transported without incident on at least two separate occasions (once by a single officer):
- “On January 17, 2015 an Alexandria police officer picked up the Emergency Custody Order and served it on Ms. McKenna. He then transported her from INOVA Alexandria hospital to the psychiatric unit at Mount Vernon Hospital.”
- On January 25th, “Fairfax Hospital cleared Ms. McKenna for release and officers arrested her on an outstanding warrant from Alexandria City.”
Knowing that McKenna was cooperative at the outset of this interaction, had recent incidents where she fully cooperated with law enforcement officers during transport, and that she had paranoid ideation about police officers trying to kill her, why did Lt. Miller think bringing a squad of masked, hazmat-suited goons into the situation would do anything other than terrify and antagonize Ms. McKenna? Indeed, her first words upon seeing the SERT team are, “You promised you wouldn’t kill me! I didn’t do anything.”
In the report, Morrogh goes over in great detail the training the sheriff’s deputies received as part of the Sheriff’s Emergency Response Team and in using tasters, but doesn’t indicate whether any of them had received Crisis Intervention Training for dealing with mentally ill persons in crisis. The report also notes the many times they told Ms. McKenna to “stop resisting,” but doesn’t question why none of them bothered to ask themselves if they should stop escalating the situation. Compliance at any cost was their objective that day, and the cost was Natasha McKenna’s life.
Excited Delirium, a.k.a “Anything but the Taser” Syndrome
Morrogh also details McKenna’s numerous health issues prior to her arriving at the jail, and concludes that they indicate the “excited delirium” listed as the cause of death by the medical examiner. He also claims in the press conference video that he has never heard of a death being caused by a Taser. That’s curious since in his report he argues that McKenna could not have died as a result of being shocked with the Taser because, “if death is due to ventricular fibrillation or asystole produced by the Taser pulse, then the individual would lose consciousness immediately (3 to 4 seconds up to a maximum of 10 to 15 seconds),” and “McKenna was conscious for several minutes after the last deployment of the Taser.”
We don’t see McKenna for most of the time while she is being tased, so we don’t really know for sure that she is conscious the entire time. The quote above seems to imply that individuals succumbing to ventricular fibrillation or asystole would at least temporarily revive and return to consciousness. In that scenario, McKenna could have lost consciousness (like when she goes limp enough for the deputies to move her around like a ragdoll on the restraint chair) after any of the four shocks, and not just the final one.
Another reason it is unlikely Morrogh had not heard of Tasers being potentially lethal instruments is that he specifically references the ECW guidelines published by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) in 2011. It’s possible that even though he was in the middle of a high-profile criminal investigation regarding use of deadly force, Morrogh may have been uninterested in the results of the use of force policy review that Fairfax County Government paid PERF $80,000 to do this year, but I’d guess their report probably landed on his desk at least once.
At any rate, PERF representatives presented the results of their review at a meeting of the Fairfax ad hoc commission to review police practices and took care to emphasize that Tasers are not non-deadly, but merely “less lethal” devices. They also stressed that Tasers should not be used to deliver more than 3 successive shocks, which is in keeping with guidelines from the manufacturer.
Key recommendations from PERF’s 2011 ECW Guidelines:
- Personnel should be trained to use an ECW for one standard cycle (five seconds) and then evaluate the situation to determine if subsequent cycles are necessary. Training protocols should emphasize that multiple applications or continuous cycling of an ECW resulting in an exposure longer than 15 seconds (whether continuous or cumulative) may increase the risk of serious injury or death and should be avoided.16. Agencies’ policy and training should discourage the use of the drive stun mode as a pain compliance technique. The drive stun mode should be used only to supplement the probe mode to complete the incapacitation circuit, or as a countermeasure to gain separation between officers and the subject so that officers can consider another force option.
- Personnel should use an ECW for one standard cycle (five seconds) and then evaluate the situation to determine if subsequent cycles are necessary. Personnel should consider that exposure to the ECW for longer than 15 seconds (whether due to multiple applications or continuous cycling) may increase the risk of death or serious injury. Any subsequent applications should be independently justifiable, and the risks should be weighed against other force options.
- All subjects who have been exposed to ECW application should receive a medical evaluation by emergency medical responders in the field or at a medical facility. Subjects who have been exposed to prolonged application (i.e., more than 15 seconds) should be transported to an emergency department for evaluation. Personnel conducting the medical evaluation should be made aware that the suspect has experienced ECW activation, so they can better evaluate the need for further medical treatment.
In the unlikely possibility that Morrogh actually was in the dark about Electronic Control Weapon (ECW) deaths, it could be because TASER International, Inc has successfully sued medical examiners who concluded that people had died as a result of being tased.
A Slate article informs us that TASER International has taken a more proactive approach in steering medical examiners away from attributing deaths to the devices they manufacture:
At a Canadian public inquiry set up in 2008 to study the appropriateness of allowing cops to use Tasers, Mike Webster, a police psychologist, went further. He blamed Taser International for “brainwashing” cops and testified that “police and medical examiners are using the term [excited delirium] as a convenient excuse for what could be excessive use of force or inappropriate control techniques during an arrest.” He went on to add that members of the law enforcement community “have created a virtual world replete with avatars that wander about with the potential to manifest a horrific condition characterized by profuse sweating, superhuman strength, and a penchant for smashing glass that appeals to well-meaning but psychologically unsophisticated police personnel.”
The ACLU and other organizations have noted that the excited delirium diagnosis is virtually non-existent outside of in-custody deaths. It is not a diagnosis recognized in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IVTR) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) system used by all US healthcare agencies and insurers. It seems to exist solely as a convenient cover to excuse gross mistreatment and abuse of mentally ill persons who die in police custody.
Pete Earley points out:
“if you check the 2012 and 2013 annual statistical reports issued by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Virginia you will not find a single mention of excited delirium as a cause of death in the state. It is not listed as a cause of any death in Virginia during 2013 in the 128 in-custody deaths that were examined by that office. Not one incident. Nor is it cited in the deaths of 60 persons with mental illnesses who were examined. Not one incident. In the entire 238 page annual report in 2013, there is absolutely no mention of a death in Virginia that was attributed to excited delirium.
The diagnosis can be traced back to 1849, the same time period that physicians were declaring that enslaved African Americans who tried to escape captivity did so because they suffered from a mental illness called drapetomania. Today we immediately recognize this as self-serving pseudoscience conjured up to defend the inhumane treatment of an oppressed group. Excited delirium is a companion piece of shameful quackery that should also be relegated to the dustbin of history.
Natasha McKenna’s Health Status and Fairfax County Sheriff’s Department ECW Policy
According to a 2009 white paper from the American College of Emergency Physicians cited in Morrogh’s report:
“ Most persons suffering from excited delirium are hyper-aggressive, impervious to pain, and demonstrate unusual, ‘superhuman’ strength. They engage in a lengthy period of struggle, followed by a period of quiet and sudden death…. Severe acidosis appears to play a prominent role in lethal [excited delirium] ExDS associated cardiovascular collapse.”
So we know from the above that acidosis is thought to contribute to excited delirium deaths, and from Natasha McKenna’s medical records that she already had acidosis, diabetes insipidus (a metabolic disorder), and an elevated heart rate prior to arriving at the county jail. We also see that the warnings from TASER International state using the Taser can produce physiologic or metabolic effects regarding acidosis, creatine kinase, lactic acid, catecholamines, and heart rate, among other effects.
So basically the Taser manual states that it can affect the same factors that excited delirium proponents say are thought to cause people to die from excited delirium.
In addition, the manual goes on to warn that individuals who are physiologically or metabolically compromised may be more susceptible to arrest-related death, and lists acidosis as a factor that can increase this susceptibility. It urges users to follow their agency’s guidance for dealing with physiologically/metabolically compromised persons.
SOP 525, the Fairfax County Sheriff Department’s policy for Electronic Control Devices states that prior to using a Taser:
ADC Medical Staff will be notified to ensure that the individual is not:
- known to have heart disease
- known to have Multiple Sclerosis
- known to have Muscular Dystrophy
Acidosis and being physiologically or metabolically compromised aren’t on this list, but it still states that medical staff should be contacted prior to using the Taser. The SERT team arrived at McKenna’s cell with the Taser already in hand, so they were aware it might be used. Did they consult with medical staff as directed by policy? It’s not recorded in Morrogh’s report nor in the incident report that they did. If they had, would the ADC medical staff have cleared the SERT team to use an ECW on an inmate with such concerning health status as Natasha McKenna?
The ECW policy also states, “medical attention will be given to any subject who has been stunned as soon as possible and when safe to do so,” and “the inmate will be examined by Medical personnel as soon as practical.” While members of the SERT team did inform medical staff that McKenna had been shocked 4 times, and vitals were initially obtained within a few minutes of the final Taser deployment, there is a long stretch where she appears motionless in the video, and is not evaluated again until it is time to put her in the transport van. Rescue is not requested for another 7 minutes after that.
While PERF guidelines state that a person who has been tasered for longer than 15 seconds should be taken to an emergency room for evaluation, and McKenna had been subjected to a cumulative 20 seconds of tasering, the transport plan was still to take her to the Alexandria City jail rather then a hospital. It does not appear that any of the medical staff were going to accompany McKenna to provide care and monitoring during transport. It’s not known if there was a formal process for staff at the Alexandria jail to be informed of the tasering incident and McKenna’s need for medical evaluation once she was transferred to them. These are aspects that will probably be explored in the civil lawsuit that will almost assuredly be materializing in this case.
In the meantime, taser use has been suspended at the ADC, the Department of Justice’s investigation into the case continues, and Fairfax County officials’ crocodile tears over unnecessary deaths at the hands of the police flow once again.
A protest regarding the outcome of this case is planned for Monday, September 14th at 7:00 PM, right before the final public comment session of the Fairfax ad hoc commission.
That Was Then
Barely a week seems to go by without a public statement being issued by officials in Fairfax County that includes some now-obligatory remark about transparency. They really seem to think that if they say the word enough, the public will actually be fooled into thinking that is the same as being transparent. It’s a tactic that’s worked before, but residents have seen this particular dog and pony show too many times before.
Here’s the Chairman of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, trying to pull the wool over our eyes by saying this is a fairly new problem, going back only 2 years.
This is a deliberate, blatant lie. Fairfax County’s secrecy and cover up attempts are legendary, leading local reporters to dub the Fairfax County Police Department “the Secret Police.”
To remember the many victims of police violence in Fairfax County, and to continue to press for justice and accountability for these deaths, Northern Virginia Cop Block is holding a protest on Tuesday, August 4th in front of the judicial center that houses the police headquarters, the sheriff’s office, county courthouse, and jail. This date coincides with National Night Out, an event that the Fairfax County Police Department has been promoting relentlessly on social media, perhaps in the desperate effort to draw attention away from their many transgressions against residents. However, messages like the one below only serve to highlight their staggering hypocrisy in refusing to hold the killer cops in their own ranks accountable for their crimes against the community.
What has the Fairfax County Police Department learned in the aftermath of John Geer’s unjustified death? If you read Iraq vet Alex Horton’s article in the Washington Post yesterday, you know the answer is “absolutely nothing.” Of course, this would have also been obvious to anyone paying attention over the past 2 years, but Horton’s experience provides striking evidence that the FCPD is still carelessly aiming weapons on unarmed residents, and sees no issue with doing it.
We learned from the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) review of the FCPD’s use of force policy and practices that the first thing new recruits go through at the police academy is firearms training. They apparently don’t bother going over the basic firearm safety rules that you see posted at every civilian gun range:
Here are the facts of the case: Alex Horton was staying in a model unit at his apartment complex because management was repairing a leak in his apartment. When he returned home one night, he accidentally left his door ajar, leading a neighbor to believe a squatter might be in the apartment. The resident then called the police. Horton recounts what happened next: Read more
Which of these 4 items is illegal?
- Filming a government building
- Not responding to police officers’ questions
- Not presenting ID to police in Virginia
- Arresting a person for any of the above
If you picked number 4, you’re right. Yet on July 3rd, Kyle David Hammond was arrested in Henrico, Virginia after refusing to speak or show his ID to police officers who took issue with his filming outside an FBI building.
As usual, police apologists commenting online were quick to show their utter ignorance of and complete disdain for basic civil liberties in America and those who exercise them. Virginia is not a “stop and identify” state; Outside of driving a vehicle, you are not required to identify yourself to law enforcement unless you are under arrest.
On June 20th, Virginia Cop Block published the news about Virginia State Trooper Melanie McKenney filing yet another Civil Lawsuit against Virginia Cop Block Founder Nathan Cox; going from a $5K lawsuit to now a $1.35 Million dollar lawsuit.
Cox’s Attorney’s over at Thomas Robert’s and Associates located in Richmond have come out of the gates swinging filing two pleadings along with their own exhibits in hopes of getting this frivolous lawsuit dismissed, this time for good.
The first pleading covers the Statute of Limitations.
Taken from the introduction:
“(1) This Suit is nothing more than a bad-faith, baseless attempt by State Trooper McKenney to hide behind her private persona and silence Nathan Cox – to retaliate against him for his First Amendment protected political activity – by issuing him a million dollar ticket.”
(2) State Trooper McKenney filed suit in small claims court on March 12, 2014. That suit was dismissed, appealed and then non-suited. By the time State Trooper McKenney filed her March 13, 2014 suit, the statute of limitations for any statement complained of had long since run. Complaint 4-9. The Complaint, State Trooper McKenney expressly claims that ‘[t]his case was previously non-suited and is being refiled within six months of the prior non-suit.’
You can read the rest of those pleadings here: Hanover Circuit Filing -1st Special Plea in Bar – Statute of Limitations
As for the second pleadings which had video exhibits, which were that of Cox’s cell phone video and the DashCam video that he acquired by way of a FOIA Request (which the videos can be found on VA Cop Block’s YouTube channel); this pleading goes after the “Truth of all actionable statements.”
The opening Introduction of that pleading states:
“(1) In this case, State Trooper M.H McKenney sues Nathan Cox for defamation after Cox shared accounts of a traffic stop in which McKenney ordered him from his car, attempted to pull a cell phone from his hands because Cox was video recording the interaction, obstructed the collection of evidence and violated Cox’s First and Fourth Amendment Rights.
(2) To Prevail, McKenney must show the statements Cox made are both actionable and false. Many of the alleged defamatory statements are not actionable as a matter of law. As for the rest, the video and other documents related to the incident show that these statements are true or substantially true. While McKenney may be personally offended by some of the statements or the mode of their expression, they are not actionable. Indeed, they constitute protected speech under the First Amendment. Therefore this case should be promptly dismissed. Alternatively, any purported statements the Court determines not to be actionable or which are true should be stricken before the case proceeds further.”
Read the rest of these pleadings here:
Hanover Circuit Filing – 2nd Special Plea in Bar – Truth of All Actionable Statements
Cox’s attorney’s will be releasing a video that will be an exhibit in this case and when that video is released, this article will be updated with the embedded video.
Continue to follow this case by following Virginia Cop Block on Facebook, Twitter and the website.
Nathan Cox is seeking donations for his Legal Defense Fund to help pay the cost of his attorneys. Consider making a donation and helping Cox protect hist First Amendment rights and perhaps, although it’s not clear, this case could help set a precedent in protecting YOUR first amendment rights in the process. Click on the image below to make a donation. Cox has stated he’ll be sending personalized hand-written thank you cards, to everyone who donates.
Also, to view the Trooper’s 11 page complaint you can find that here: $1.35M Civil Lawsuit / 11 Page Complaint.
This meme went viral over Independence Day weekend. In it, a collage of photos shows a young man burning an American Flag and an older man snatching the flag from the flames, shoving it into the younger man’s face and pushing him down on the ground.
Regardless of how you feel about flag burning, you should know that the Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that it is an act of protected free speech under the First Amendment. You should also know that initiating physical violence on someone for burning the flag is not exercising your First Amendment rights; it is the criminal act of assault. Being aware of these two facts already puts you way ahead of the cops and cop apologists posting at Survive the Streets: A Page for Cops and Police Beat, two pro-police Facebook pages that shared the series of images above.
The comments left on the pages speak volumes about the cops and cop apologists who wrote them, and it isn’t that they are fine upstanding Americans.
It can be really illuminating to see which posts the police apologist trolls choose to comment on. A recent case in point is this Police the Police image that I recently shared to the Northern Virginia Cop Block page. Immediately, one of our regular trolls commented saying that both postal workers and Cesar Millan have killed dogs. Of course this is a classic deflection attempt that we often see with police apologists—Not that the police don’t do something, but that it’s irrelevant or even OK because some other group does it also. If postal workers and Cesar Millan do indeed kill dogs what does that prove? That it is suddenly acceptable for cops to kill dogs because they have plenty of dog-killing company?
Fellow Police Accountability supporters! After MUCH delay, we are finally releasing TWO designs for shirts/ hoodies.
This is a PRE-SALE only, similar to music artists who Pre-Sale albums. You MUST Pay for for gear upfront.
Pre-Sale Ordering begins today, June 27 and will END at the end of the day on July 15.
I’m told by the Shirt/Sign/ Decal business that products will be ready no more than 2 weeks after order is submitted to them – so you can potentially have your gear by the end of the month of July.
1 for $20 (+ $5.50 shipping)
Or 2 for $33 (+ $5.50 shipping)
1 for $35 (+ $12 shipping)
2 for $60 (+ $12 shipping)
What you see in the picture, is Read more
Written by: Nathan Cox
In March of 2014, local Richmond media (along with Virginia Cop Block) reported that I was being sued by Virginia State Trooper Melanie McKenney as a result from a traffic stop that transpired on Memorial Day weekend 2012, nearly two years prior, in which I later wrote an article about. The initial suit was for “defamation” which was filed in small claims court and she was suing me for $5,000.
The initial “warrant in-debt” I received had no attached complaint or allegations and I had no idea what it was about. I later formed the opinion that McKenney was upset about something I perhaps wrote in the article about the stop. The article also included information I acquired by way of a Freedom of Information Act Request. This information I received included electronic forms of communication, radio transmissions and her dashboard camera.
During this first go around, Read more